Chomsky’s the Cheese.

February 6, 2009 at 8:00 pm (Reading Response Blogs) (, )

Noam ChomskyIn my three years of Education at McGill, these two readings may have been the most interesting and insightful readings I’ve done. Any student who has done their Bachelor of Education at McGill has read or heard of Noam Chomsky and his anarchist-ish theories on politics. Not only is he a genius in the field of linguistics, he is also very involved in social justice and world politics. To be quite honest, I think Mr. Chomsky is the cheese. His theories in linguistics and his leftist political stands are enlightening in a time where saying what he often says is oh-so taboo.

So now that I have finished my biased appraisal of Noam Chomsky, I will start off by discussing how I feel about the readings from Chapter 7. Although this chapter was short, I felt as though I learned so much from it. Each sentence was more interesting and informative than the last. I felt so involved and in touch with the readings, I even had to stop and call my father to discuss a particular passage from the readings. After having read about the American involvement in the Lebanese Civil War, it struck a cord. I had always heard from my father the details about the war, but I had never suspected such huge American involvement. My dad and I had a good chat about what happened in Lebanon during those years and the American involvement in other wars. It’s no secret that the latest war in Iraq was backed with an economic and imperial agenda; however, I hadn’t known the extent in other wars. The article informed me of the strong U.S. pull to convince the world that the Arabs were/are public enemy #1 not only this time around, but almost 20 years ago as well. The issues discussed are so real and relevant; it felt wonderful to be reading about this for a class.

middle-east-peace-dove

Dr.Kincheloe’s article in chapter 6 was also incredibly motivating. His discussion about the U.S’ motivations in all the wars was fascinating to learn about. I was shocked to read about the American involvement in South America and the consequences stemming from these actions. This article made me reflect on the American trend. Every few decades there’s a new country to hate and to be afraid of. The Americans use media to infuse fear and hatred towards other countries, depending of the political gain. Starting after the civil rights movement, being Japanese was the new Black. Then being Russian, was the new Japanese. And now, being an Arab is exactly what you do not want to be. Regardless of your religion, of your ethnicity, or of your political view, if you enjoy hummus, you are a terrorist and the devil. Which is precisely what the American government wanted pre-911.


These articles make me wonder about the present American state. Although I am a huge Obama supporter, I can’t help but think about Kincheloe’s imperial puzzle. Now that Obama is in power and that the neo-conservatism is out, eventually the American “imperial mentality” will die. Will the new government need to re-establish this mentality at some point? I’m not sure if I’m making any sense, but I will leave it at that for now.

Advertisements

Permalink Leave a Comment